Wednesday, July 11, 2007
Flag on the Moon
Old Glory flies in many places around the world. Did you know that it also flies somewhere that is not on this world? That’s right! The flag flies on the surface of the moon too!
"This site should be the homepage of every 4th, 5th, and 6th grade school computer in America." Hugh Hewitt
AMELIA EARHART
On July 2, 1937, Amelia Earhart flew away from a town called Lae in the South Pacific. Earhart was attempting to circumnavigate the globe. After taking off from Lae, she disappeared. The Superhero Historians will investigate her life, her final flight, and the possible outcomes to that flight.
See all posts in this topic
If you enjoy Superhero Historians, please consider leaving a tip. Thanks!
Click the Feed Icon to subscribe to the Superhero Historian Feed or click on "Superhero Email" to get posts emailed to your inbox.
Old Glory flies in many places around the world. Did you know that it also flies somewhere that is not on this world? That’s right! The flag flies on the surface of the moon too!
The planting of the United States flag on the lunar surface was not a simple one. There were many different things to think about. The moon has no atmosphere so NASA had to design a flag with an extra crossbar to make it stay open. They also needed to think about the spacesuits that the astronauts wore. Those spacesuits weren’t like wearing a pair of shorts and a t-shirt, they limited movement. So the flag needed to be easy to open and assemble in space.
Believe it or not, work on the flag began about three months before the flight to the moon. The entire flag and poles weighed 9 pounds and 7 ounces. The flag is 3x5 feet. They painted a ring on the pole 18 inches from the bottom, so the astronauts would know how deep they were putting the flag. The flag was stored on the side of the ladder of the Landing Module, but they needed to protect it from the heat produced during landing, around 2000 degrees. Man, that would over-cook anything. Neil Armstrong and “Buzz” Aldrin planted the flag, but only about 9 inches deep!
Real quick, name the person who made the first United States flag? Most of you probably said “Betsy Ross.” Now, there are some people who disagree with this, but there is evidence that supports Betsy Ross being the first to make the flag.
The story says that a secret Congressional Committee, including George Washington, Robert Morris, and George Ross, went to Betsy Ross for the creation of the flag. George Washington showed her a sketch of the design with six pointed stars. Betsy Ross said she could do five pointed stars in one snip of her scissors, and she went on to create the flag. This story was brought to public attention by Ross’ grandson William Canby. Canby’s story relies on his own memory of the story that his grandmother told to him.
Canby’s story has come under the microscope in recent years. Here are a couple of things to keep in mind: Betsy Ross knew each committee member. She even attended church with and sewed buttons for George Washington. The painting below was made years before Canby brought the story to the public’s attention. Also, Francis Hopkinson, the man many historians believe designed the first flag, used six pointed stars in his flags.
As with a lot of things in history, there is no definitive. We do the best we can do to get to the truth of what really happened. At this point, there is no lock solid proof that Betsy Ross designed the first flag… but there isn’t lock solid proof that she didn’t.
Listen up! You may have noticed that the United States flag patch worn by the United States military looks different than the flag on a lot of other things. Here is the reason why, direct from the military.
Army Regulation 670-1, “Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia,” updated most recently September 5, 2003, addresses explicitly the proper and lawful placement of the U.S. flag patch on the Army uniform.
The regulation states that when authorized for application to the proper uniform the American flag patch is to be worn, right or left shoulder, so that “the star field faces forward, or to the flag’s own right. When worn in this manner, the flag is facing to the observer’s right, and gives the effect of the flag flying in the breeze as the wearer moves forward. The appropriate replica for the right shoulder sleeve is identified as the ‘reverse side flag’.”
That, if I may say, is cool.
...hide moreThe United States flag flaps with the wind over government buildings, businesses, sports stadiums, ships, private homes, and fists. A widely used symbol of the United States it is instantly recognizable to most. Let’s go over some basics.
The flag today has 13 stripes, alternating red and white, and 50 white stars set in a blue section. The stripes recognize the 13 colonies that stood together against Great Britain during the American Revolution. The stars represent the 50 states. On June 24, 1912 the president signed an Executive Order giving guidelines for flag proportions and star layout. Before this order flags sometimes had different layouts.
We hope that you have enjoyed our segment on the Boston Tea Party. For any information about sources, click on the sidebar Sources tab. For any other questions or comments, feel free to contact the Superhero Historians. The Boston Tea Party is a huge topic and we hope that you do some more reading and research on it.
Check back this week for our new topic!
Listen up. I told you before that I would return a bit to the French and Indian War. Remember that George Washington gained military experience from this war. It is important to note that the Battle of the Great Meadows was the only battle in history where George Washington surrendered.
Washington commanded 400 troops and built Fort Necessity during this early battle. After a day of attempted defense, he surrendered on July 4, 1754. Yes, July 4. What did this experience of surrender teach Washington? In the Revolutionary War he faced disastrous circumstances and refused to surrender. History is always connected.
Barley wants me to tell you that you can visit the site of Fort Necessity. The fort was burned by the French, but the site is maintained. The photo is a reproduction of the fort.
The final Intolerable Act dealt with all 13 Colonies and not just Massachusetts. Not just Massachusetts. It was called the Quartering Act. This act said British soldiers were to be housed in private homes, in addition to empty and commercial buildings. This was a change to an already existing Quartering Act. The existing act stated that colonists needed to make room for soldiers in empty and commercial dwellings. Think taverns and such. Now soldiers were to be boarding at the actual homes of the colonists! Right, smack-dab in their homes.
The Boston Port Act is the third Intolerable Act we will cover. The Port Act is very basic. British Parliament closed down Boston’s port until the city repaid the money lost from the Boston Tea Party. Britain lost money on customs and the East India Company lost their money in the big drink. Sploosh. Remember, Ben Franklin wanted the money repaid as well. Every last cent repaid (or pound sterling). Let’s see, get out your calculators: 342 crates of tea… carry the 1… move the decimal point… about £9,659. This act backfired in a way. The other colonies started sending supplies to Massachusetts and this helped bring together all of the colonies.
The Administration of Justice Act was another one of the Intolerable Acts passed by Great Britain. This act deals with courts and justice. It stated that trials would not be taken care of locally. Instead the Governor could send the trials to Great Britain or other British Colonies to be seen in front of a British judge and jury. Can you imagine what effect that had on justice? Colonists could count on any decision to be pro-British! Any British official who acted out against the colonists could be saved by a British court decision.
Are you seeing anything in these Intolerable Acts? Keep in mind the liberties that the United States hold very high and you will see how they combat governing like the Intolerable Acts.
The Intolerable Acts are split into four different acts. The one we are going to go over today is the Massachusetts Government Act.
Parliament passed it on May 20, 1774. The act got rid of elections for councilors and assistants in the colony, making them royally appointed instead. The act also put big time limitations on town meetings. Remember how much the colonists loved to have town meetings? This act struck a huge blow to the independence of the colonies. One gigantic blow. It took self-government away from the colonists in Massachusetts.
King George III
The British may have sat around for three hours doing nothing while colonists dunked East India Company tea into the harbor, but they didn’t wait long to react after the last tea leaf drowned. While walking away from the wharf the partygoers heard British Admiral Montague yell, “"Well boys, you have had a fine, pleasant evening for your Indian caper, haven’t you? But mind, you have got to pay the fiddler yet!” The fiddler was British Parliament. The song they played was the Intolerable Acts.
The Intolerable Acts included the Massachusetts Government Act, Administration of Justice Act, Boston Port Act, and the Quartering Act. Phineas will go over these one by one in the following days.
The Boston Tea Party destroyed 342 chests of tea. The East India Company claimed to have lost £9,659, which would equal around a million smackaroos today. That is a big statement by the colonists and a huge loss for the East India Company. The statement got its exclamation point the following day when colonists drifted around the harbor in boats, beating any floating tea with their oars.
As a little side note, Benjamin Franklin wanted the lost money to be repaid.
For an act of rebellion, the Boston Tea Party was orderly. The Party was a well-planned event, not a scramble of colonists running out at the last minute to do damage. No last minute damage. Remember that December 16 was the final day for the colonists to do anything. They wanted to make a statement. The best way to make that statement was to be in control.
According to eyewitness George Hewes, the Partygoers were split into three groups. One, two, three groups. Men in one group did not know the commanders of the other groups, or what they were doing. We then quietly retired to our several places of residence, without having any conversation with each other, or taking any measures to discover who were our associates; nor do I recollect of our having had the knowledge of the name of a single individual concerned in that affair, except that of Leonard Pitt, the commander of my division, whom I have mentioned. There appeared to be an understanding that each individual should volunteer his services, keep his own secret, and risk the consequence for himself. No disorder took place during that transaction, and it was observed at that time that the stillest night ensued that Boston had enjoyed for many months.
The colonists also took great care to not harm any of the crew, steal any tea, or damage any property. A single lock broke during the Party. It was replaced. Replaced. One man, Captain O’Connor is said to have placed tea in the lining of his jacket. The other Partygoers spotted him and relieved him of the tea and his duty at the Party. The men were even said to have shook their shoes free of tea before leaving the ships.
The Boston Tea Party was a masterpiece of political protest. Saying “no” to authority by dumping tea into the harbor was brilliant. Brilliant. Most of the descriptions of the Tea Party say that participants dressed themselves as Mohawk Indians. But did they?
Here are some accounts of the Tea Party and what they have to say about the “Mohawk Indians.”
The Boston Evening Post, Monday, December 20, 1773
Previous to the dissolution, a number of Persons, supposed to be the Aboriginal Natives from their completion, approaching near the door of the assembly, gave the War Whoop, which was answered by a few in the galleries of the house where the assembly was convened; silence was commanded, and prudent and peaceable deportment again enjoined. The Savages repaired to the ships which entertained the pestilential Teas, and had began their ravage previous to the dissolution of the meeting--they apply themselves to the destruction of the commodity in earnest, and in the space of about two hours broke up 342 chests and discharged their contents into the sea.
Massachusetts Gazette
Just before the dissolution of the meeting, a number of brave and resolute men, dressed in the Indian manner, approached near the door of the Assembly, gave the war whoop, which rang through the house and was answered by some in the galleries, but silence being commanded, and a peaceable deportment was again enjoined till the dissolution. The Indians, as they were then called, repaired to the wharf where the ships lay that had the tea on board, and were followed by hundreds of people to see the event of the transactions of those who made so grotesque an appearance.
They, the Indians, immediately repaired on board Captain Hall’s ship, where they hoisted out the chests of tea, and when upon deck stove the chests and emptied the tea overboard; having cleared this ship they proceeded to Captain Bruce’s and then to Captain Coffin’s brig. They applied themselves so dexterously to the destruction of this commodity that in the space of three hours they broke up 342 chests, which was the whole number in those vessels, and discharged the contents into the dock. When the tide rose it floated the broken chests and the tea insomuch that the surface of the water was filled therewith a considerable way from the south part of the town to Dorchester Neck, and lodged on the shores. There was the greatest care taken to prevent the tea from being purloined by the populace. One or two, being detected in endeavouring to pocket a small quantity, were stripped of their acquisitions and very roughly handled.
Account by Tea Party Participant George Hewes
It was now evening, and I immediately dressed myself in the costume of an Indian, equipped with a small hatchet, which I and my associates denominated the tomahawk, with which, and a club, after having painted my face and hands with coal dust in the shop of a blacksmith, I repaired to Griffin’s wharf, where the ships lay that contained the tea. When I first appeared in the street after being thus disguised, I fell in with many who were dressed, equipped and painted as I was, and who fell in with me and marched in order to the place of our destination.
Here is another eyewitness account by participant Ebenezer Stevens. His account differs on the Mohawk Indian disguises.
We commenced handing the boxes of tea on deck, and first commenced breaking them with axes, but found much difficulty, owing to the boxes of tea being covered with canvass—the mode that this article was then imported in. I think that all the tea was discharged in about two hours. We were careful to prevent any being taken away; none of the party were painted as Indians, nor, that I know of disguised, excepting that some of them stopped at a paint shop on the way and daubed their faces with paint.
Stevens does note that some participants may have stopped to put paint on their faces. Why would the Tea Party throwers want to disguise themselves? They were being watched during the Tea Party and wanted to keep their identity secret. Which account is true? It is possible that there were some disguised and some not disguised.